Note: If you arrived here from another site and you're looking for the protest images, just scroll on down toward the end of the article.
--Alan
Here we go again. Yet another study on Global Warming, this one conducted by 600 scientists, is due to be released in early February. The new study will supposedly constitute a "smoking gun" in terms of the evidence of Man's role in the changing climate. The anti-capitalist Left is in all likelihood panting in anticipation.From an AP article at cnn.com:
"The smoking gun is definitely lying on the table as we speak," said top U.S. climate scientist Jerry Mahlman, who reviewed all 1,600 pages of the first segment of a giant four-part report. "The evidence ... is compelling."
Why is it that Global Warming alarmists are nearly always referred to as a "top U.S. climate scientist" or an "expert on climate change" while those whose research has led to different (but politically inconvenient) conclusions are ridiculed and marginalized? Last time I checked, it was still a good idea to have a free and open discussion on matters as important as the global climate.
Regarding the soon-to-be-released report, a twelve-page summary is being created for use by policymakers. That summary will be released to the public on February Second. As to the report's credibility, the following quote from the same AP article says all any thinking individual needs to know:
"They said that the 12-page summary for policymakers will be edited in secret word-by-word by governments officials for several days next week and released to the public on February 2.”
In other words, the various leftist elements in governments around the world (including our own) will make certain you only see what they want you to see. Politics as usual.
That our climate is changing, there can be no doubt. That is, after all what a climate does. The jet stream, ocean currents, and solar activity all play a role in climate change. That isn't the issue. What's at issue is the level of influence human activity holds in the greater scheme of all things climatological.
Every few months a new report is released that purports to be the final word on global climate change. Mankind, say the reports, is destroying the environment and it’s only a matter of time before we have a natural disaster of Biblical proportion. And every time this happens credible, non-political scientists debunk it to the very last tidbit of junk science. I don't doubt that this newest report will be similarly debunked once agenda-free experts have the opportunity to look it over. The real question is: Will the Leftists listen to those who offer contrary evidence?
Probably not. They rarely do.
The extreme Left both in the US and abroad is driven solely by its own agenda. The truth, when it contradicts the Left’s agenda, is considered an obstacle to be overcome. The lengths to which leftists will go to push their version of the facts upon the general populace are astounding. Let’s look first at some of the Global Warming myths presented as fact by the Left, then take a look at some of the more absurd actions they’ve taken in recent years to attract attention.Myth #1 - The Greenland Ice Sheet
For a number of years Global Warming alarmists have been screaming that Greenland’s Ice Sheet is melting. The flood of fresh water into the ocean will of course flood many low-lying land masses and cause irreparable harm.
Fact: While coastal areas of Greenland have indeed experienced melting in recent years, there has been an overall gain in the total ice during the 11-year period studied (1992 - 2003). Greenland has more, not less ice.
Myth #2 - Slowing Atlantic Meridional Circulation (a.k.a. “thermohaline circulation”)
This pertains to Northern Atlantic Ocean currents that carry warm water northward and bring cooler water to areas farther south. Harry Bryden (UK National Oceanography Centre) concluded that greenhouse gasses were slowing the circulation, and that Europe would be hit with all manner of weather-related disasters. The currents had, said Bryden, weakened by thirty percent. The media pounced on Bryden’s findings, broadcasting them far and wide as though they were the last word on global warming.
Fact: Further research by World Climate Report and German scientist Friedrich Schott proved conclusively that there has been a strengthening, not a weakening, of the meridional circulation. Expected temperature changes in Europe brought on by a weakening current never happened, thus providing the final nail in the coffin for Bryden’s fright-mongering.
Myth #3 - The Earth is nearing its warmest average temperature in one million years
This nonsense was being pushed by NASA’s alarmist extraordinaire James Hansen. His “global temperature” findings were nearly all based on readings taken from one small area in the Equatorial Pacific. I’m no expert, but I’d think that to create accurate global predictions one would need global data.
Fact: Similar testing done in other regions yielded vastly different results, quickly refuting Hansen’s bogus research.
Myth # 4 - Mt Kilimanjaro’s snow pack is melting due to greenhouse gasses
For several years, alarmists have claimed that Kilimanjaro’s retreating snow pack is being affected by the desertification in East Africa which is of course the result of human-caused global warming.
Fact: “The gradual retreat of the snows of Kilimanjaro is often imputed to local phenomena, the main one of these being desertification in East Africa. In a recent issue of Science magazine, French researchers have shown that this desertification was in a large measure due to tectonic activities responsible for the gradual uplift of the African continent, thereby inducing a reorganization of atmospheric circulation. Greenhouse effect plays no significant role in these processes.”
The above information is a quote from “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” by Claude Allegre. Allegre is a former alarmist who, through proper research and unbiased viewing of the facts, came to realize manmade global warming is a farce.
Myth #5 - The Antarctic Ice is melting
We’ve all heard this one. The world will be flooded by rising seawater because the use of (gasp!) fossil fuels is pumping all those greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.
Fact: The Antarctic is actually colder now than seventy years ago, and its ice and snow cover has increased, rather than decreased. Consider this tidbit from World Climate Report:
A recent study, no shocker to real climatologists (but perhaps to climate doomsayers), demonstrates this simple physics. It appears in the latest SciencExpress, and it shows that the vast majority of the Antarctic landmass is rapidly gaining ice and snow cover.
Obviously this moisture comes from the sea. And, being deposited in solid form on the land-way-down-under, this lowers the earth’s sea level.
Myth #6 - The Global Warming Phenomenon is due to human activity
This one of course provides the basis for all the above. Human use of fossil fuels is creating a “greenhouse effect” in the atmosphere, causing a steady rise in global average temperatures.
Fact: The Earth has been significantly hotter than it is now, and this has occurred numerous times throughout history. Here’s an excerpt from a Washington Post article on the subject:
The carbon and nitrogen content of ancient rocks retrieved from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean 1,000 miles east of Japan indicate that ocean surface temperatures fluctuated by as much as 11 degrees Fahrenheit during the Cretaceous period 120 million years ago.
Scientists from Indiana University at Bloomington and the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research detailed their findings in this month's issue of Geology.
Previous research had found evidence of a changeable climate in the Atlantic Ocean around the same period, but not much was known about what was going on in the Pacific, said Indiana geologist Simon Brassell, who led the new study.
You read it right. One hundred twenty million years ago. Do you suppose that the dinosaurs were running around in pollution-belching SUV’s and diesel trucks? That’s the only possible answer, since man did not exist at that time.
As is typical of the Left, when science fails to support their agenda they will resort to some truly bizarre tactics to sway public opinion. It is unfortunate that so many media outlets and left-leaning politicians share these backwards views. If the Left had its way, we’d all be riding bicycles or roller skates and our table napkins would be made of recycled toilet paper.
One of the craziest tactics used by leftwing extremists is the nude protest. All over the world, left-wingers get together and lose their clothes in the name of peace, the environment, energy independence, so on and so forth. Large and well-financed organizations have surfaced over the years and with the help of the Internet and a complicit media, the “get naked for Earth” movement has swelled to alarming proportions.Would you care to see a gang of naked people, often body-painted like savages, on bicycles pedaling through your neighborhood? I’m all for free speech and free expression, but this is beyond any reasonable expectation of freedom. If you walk down the street naked, but alone, it’s a good bet you’ll be arrested in short order. And you’d deserve it.
So how is it okay for a large group of people to parade through town in the nude?
It isn’t okay, and authorities who tolerate it should be driven from their jobs and replaced by people who have some sense of decency. Do we wish for our young children to be exposed to such filth? As you can see from the images here, I am exaggerating neither the lunacy or the perversion of these people. I'll also say that these folks do not represent all liberals. There are still some old-fashioned true blue liberals in the world. But their numbers are dwindling.The adults who participated in this disgusting display should be arrested, tried, convicted and registered as sex offenders. Exposing one’s self to a child is a criminal offense, and these freaks should not be allowed such a flagrant violation of both the law and human decency.
And let’s not forget the Earth Liberation Front (E.L.F.). This is an eco-terrorist group that has caused over $200 million in damages in the US alone. Their stated goal is to use "economic sabotage and guerrilla warfare to stop the exploitation and destruction of the natural environment." They are regarded by the FBI as a very serious threat to life and liberty in the US, and rightfully so.Greenpeace is a non-violent organization, but they’ve managed to cost logging companies untold millions of dollars worldwide by disrupting operations. It’s worth noting that most forests are replanted once they’ve been harvested, and the new and often healthier forests provide a habitat for several generations of wildlife before they’re harvested again. Greenpeace seems to have missed this fact.
In conclusion, I can only say that there is absolutely no credible evidence of significant human influence where global warming is concerned. The planet heats and cools cyclically, and nothing Man does, short of a nuclear holocaust, can change it. Those on the left who attempt to inflict their views upon us are perfectly willing to use whatever tactics are necessary to achieve their goals of worldwide communism and primitive living. The bogus Kyoto Accord is a perfect example of the junk science and harmful regulations being pushed by leftists in every walk of life - from grassroots organizations to the anti-American United Nations.
Our best weapon against this craziness is to stay informed. One should automatically question any new information regarding climate change if it comes from a liberal source - the alphabet networks, CNN, liberal rags like the New York Times, etc. Below you’ll find links to reliable, agenda-free sources of information on climate change. Please do take advantage of them.Related Reading:
Global Warming Debunkers:
- CNN article on the “Smoking Gun”
- World Climate Report (meridional circulation)
- World Climate Report (Antarctic Ice)
- There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
- Greenland Ice Sheet: Going, Going ... Growing!
- How Warm Is the Earth Nowadays?
- US Senate Committee on the Environment & Public Works
The Loony Left:

6 comments:
Great information to back up the Global Warming fraud. The world isn't melting, folks can just "chill." LOL.
And the naked folks, just plain made me sick. GROSS!
I'm amazed at those Americans who find nudity somehow offensive, ugly or unnatural. I find you offensive, ugly and definitely unnatural.
Anonymous said...
"I'm amazed at those Americans who find nudity somehow offensive, ugly or unnatural. I find you offensive, ugly and definitely unnatural."
-----------------------------------
Well, gee. Most people don't find me offensive and ugly until AFTER they see me naked. I must be losing my sex appeal. :p
Oddly enough, "Nick" left the following comment on "The Ashley Treatment" - an article about a disabled girl and her parents' heroic efforts to give her a normal life. I am assuming that he meant to post the comment here instead. Then again, since poor Nick seems to be following all of the liberal talking points (evil lumber companies, etc), who knows? His comments are below...
I completely understand the skepticism toward "global warming", but we must review the facts. We are obligated to do so. The evidence that the earth is getting warmer very fast is no more evident than it is in Glacier National Park, Montana. There is no denying that none of the 150 glaciers will be present in the next 20-50 years. There were over 150 documented glaciers in 1850. There are now 35.(1) Soil erosion leading to salinization, creating man made drought, combined with leaking sediments from erosion. Poisons from abandoned hard rock mines, and deforestation, are warming up our streams and rivers. While at the same time leaking unregulated poisons from mines into rivers, and streams killing off fresh water fish by raising the water temperature, and adding hard rock trailings. This happens in Montana today.(2)
Myth 1)- The Greenland ice sheet. The earth does not spin perfectly. It in fact has a bit of a wobble to it.(3) Resulting in regular climate change, as some parts of the earth get a little closer to the sun in some years, then get farther in others. fluctuation in the temperatures can be averaged, and core sediment samples taken from bogs and marshes prove this. We can not base our theory on one islands 11 year history, of for that matter, an 11 year study of anything in nature.
Myth 2)-Green house gassed effecting oceanic currents. O.k. I agree with this. The reason is that there is no conclusive evidence to support the idea that green house gasses effect oceanic currents. Nothing that I have read any way has convinced me of this. However, the fluctuation of our ocean currents are also at the mercy of the wobble(3). Meaning that just like myth one, more than a few years of study must be considered.
Myth 3)-The earth reaching its hottest temperature in a million years. What is actually funny about this argument, is that just as James Hansen's study was confined to a small area. As was the opposition. Both sides have information worth deciphering. (see myth 6)
Myth 4)-Mt. Kilimanjaro- This argument is similar to Hansen's in that it refers to one place. Again these mountains are at the mercy of the wobble. This argument is confined.
Myth 5)- The Antarctic Ice is melting (see myth 1).
Myth 6)-The Global Warming Phenomenon is due to human activity- The "wobble" was way more intense during the early years of the earths development. For all we know, seasons changed every 2 days. Parts of the earth were getting closer to the sun they ever will. This of course means that we are farther from the sun now than we ever have been. So why would prehistoric heating trends still be occurring?
It is funny that in bringing your argument to a close, you could find no issue more pressing than naked people on bicycles. Priorities huh? Logging companies, despite what we want to believe, work only for immediate profits. Over 90% of logging companies in the world operate outside the law.(2) In the Dominican Republic, military force has been used to clear out thousands of illegal logging operations. After years of abuse, they now use deadly force to "exterminate" illegal logging operations. This practice is not limited to just the Dominican Republic.
Greenpeace costing the logging industry millions does not even hold a candle to the untold billions of dollars lost in crop destruction due to soil erosion from deforestation. The loss of freshwater fish in our streams and rivers from sediment runoff. Extinctions of entire species as a result, and paralyzing the fishing industry. Large forest fires as a result of replanted trees with no undergrowth are costing human lives, and property. Flames that would otherwise burn off the undergrowth first, now reach the canopies with ease, as there is nowhere else for the flames to go. Also costing billions to taxpayers for fighting fires, as a direct result of bad forest management by huge logging corporations. Greenpeace, and naked bikers, should rank very low on our list of concerns.
(1)http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarming/articles/glacier.asp
(2)Jared Diamond-Collapse.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3641551737596451012&q=Jared+diamond
(3)http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/05/04052006565
You're harping on about minor children seeing naked people (minor children who, incidentally, don't seem to be the slightest bit phased by the nudity) when there's violence on T.V. and violence being ignored when it happens on the street?
So you bring your kids up to be ashamed of their bodies do you? Wow, great parenting skills there. That's exactly what you are doing when you tell them that bodies should be covered up (and thus imply there's something shameful about their own bodies).
There are many places around the world where nudity is accepted and involves kids and adults - with nothing sexual happening - because these people realise that it's nuts to say the body should be covered for any reason other than to keep off the cold or prevent sunburn. It's not sexual, and it doesn't harm kids (unless, perhaps, if the kids have been brought up in abusive environments - in which case it's the sicko that harmed them who needs locking up, not innocent nudists). We were born naked, if you have a probelm with that then take it up with our creator (whether you believe that's a Supreme Being or the big bang).
It's not the nudists fault you're a pervert who thinks dirty thoughts when you see a person dressed the way they were born.
As for the offence argument - virtually everything is offensive to someone. Walking around with your top off is probably offensive to people from strict Muslim countries - would you (or your wife) be happy being forced to wear a full burka then in high temperatures, just because it offends someone??
Hello All...
The most recent poster (above) seems to think that we should all just get naked and run around willy nilly.
I wonder if he/she has any clue as to the virtues of modesty? I for one don't care to be in an environment where everyone (especially those who look like me!) is naked. I don't need to see big floppy boobs shaking off the sweat on the volleyball court, and I certainly don't care to see some hairy-assed guy fingering his schlong with one hand while picking his nose with the other.
Nudity is fine in private. As I write this I am clad only in my reading glasses. But then again, no one can see me but me - and I ain't planning to go to McDonald's without getting dressed.
Best to All
Alan
Post a Comment