Monday, August 24, 2009

What Exactly, is the Government's Job?


By Alan Burkhart

With each passing day the federal government takes on more and more responsibility. And with each new obligation it assumes, the quality of the services We The People receive declines.

Health care is no exception. I'll be honest: If government could offer a viable, affordable, effective, simple and expedient method of health care delivery I'd be tempted to join up. But no government is capable of doing such a thing. The impending insolvency of Medicare and Medicaid, along with the overall shoddy performance of the Veterans Administration should be ample proof of this fact.  The United States Government is incapable, regardless of whatever benevolent intentions it may have, of implementing and managing a nationwide health care system. The so-called "public option" should not be an option at all.

The sheer size and scope of the plan put forth by the House of Representatives is a prime example of government incompetence. The massive bureaucracy defined within this bill would add thousands of new government employees, dozens of counter-productive new regulations and trillions of dollars in taxpayer expenditures. This is the only way our government knows how to operate. Long gone are the days of a lean and effective government that understood its own limits. Today's federal government is a blind, one-legged hippopotamus hopping about in the china closet of the US economy. These people are incapable of managing their own expenses, and yet they wish to run and over-regulate a gigantic segment of the economy? Frightening to contemplate.

Certainly, there must be laws in place to ensure proper protections for the people where health care is concerned. But like all things, it is a matter of degree. There is a fine line between proper governance and intrusive government. Our government has crossed that line so many times that its footprints have almost completely obliterated it.

It is not the federal government's job to take on such huge responsibilities. It is not the place of Congress and the President to attempt to run the lives of every American, and assuming this level of control over our health care system would amount to exactly that: Government control over a large and growing portion of our private lives. President Obama can deny it all he wishes, but more and more people are reading the text of the House bill and finding that its passage would be a life-altering event for every American.

What then, is government's job?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

That's not my opinion. It's the law, stated clearly in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. No where in the Constitution does it state that government has the right to meddle in our health care system. No where in the Constitution does it state that  government should be bailing out failing businesses or robbing Citizen A to pay Citizen B.

The federal government's job is to maintain a strong national defense, a national system of highways, and a framework of laws to protect the rights of the citizenry. It is not the place of the federal government to micromanage the lives of the populace.

Mister President, I like my health insurance just fine. The absolute best thing you and your cronies on Capitol Hill can do for health care is Nothing At All. We don't need, or want, your "help."

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

I’ll Keep My Clunker

Now THIS is what I call cruisin'! One of President Obama’s great ideas for our country is that we should trade in our “clunkers” for modern fuel efficient cars. “Clunker” in this case is defined as anything that doesn’t get fuel mileage comparable to that of a bicycle, or perhaps an ox-drawn cart.

My first concern with what I drive is safety, followed by comfort, the “fun factor,” and finally……. fuel mileage. A vehicle must deliver on all the former before the latter becomes a consideration. Sorry folks, but that’s just how it is.

 Just kidding! I'm not a real car. Regarding safety versus fuel economy, I have from day one wondered why anyone in his or her right mind would drive one of the tiny sub-compacts.  While I’m sure environuts like President Obama love these things, they’re little more than a go-karts with air conditioning. Consider the so-called “Smart” car: I’ve passed them with my truck running down the interstate and watched them in the right mirror when they bobble to the right from the wind of my passing. And mind you, that’s with me driving the speed limit. I rarely get over 65 or 70 mph. The little car just doesn’t have enough mass to be stable on the road.

At the Smart website, the Smart is described as follows:

Discover a car that has been perfectly designed for your everyday life. A car that offers maximum comfort, agility, safety, ecology and driving fun. A pioneering vehicle concept that is one of the best with its low CO2 emission figures.

Safety? Gee, really? How the hell can you be safe driving a pregnant roller skate? And I’ve never seen one traveling over about 60 or so. Are they really that slow? This is not a safe car. It’s not even a speed bump.

The sole legitimate criteria for the safety of any vehicle is how well it protects its occupants. There is no other criteria. And in terms of protection in an accident, regardless of who’s at fault, the more solid the vehicle, the safer you are. The left is of course fully aware of the safety factor. But they’re more concerned with a pile of agenda-driven, bogus environmental propaganda than the safety of the driving public. Their actions in this regard make it obvious.

The facts behind an Internet rumor…

OUCH!!! Today my good friend Nita emailed me a picture of a  Ford Escape that got crunched between a couple of dump trucks in Louisiana. This is the image purported as being a Smart car on various blogs. I first checked at Snopes to see if it was really a car or just a garbage can, but Snopes was still investigating the rumor. Being the epitome of accuracy and run-on sentences, I  tracked down the truth by calling the Jefferson Parish, LA Sheriff’s Office and speaking to an officer who was present at the scene of the accident. 

When I grow up, I'll be an Expedition! Incredibly, the lady driving the Escape… escaped. The officer (I don’t have permission to use his name) informed me that the impact was offset to the passenger side. The driver’s side (not visible in the photo) wasn’t as badly damaged. According to the officer, she has since been released from the hospital. But still folks, LOOK AT THE IMAGE. The vehicle was utterly annihilated.  How much pain did she suffer from her injuries? Far more I would imagine, than had she been driving an Expedition or a Suburban. I’m glad she survived. Were I her, I’d definitely sue the jackass driving the red Mack. But consider for just a moment: What if the rumor had been true, and she was driving a Smart? Think she’d be alive today?

I have one. You don't. Ha! I drive a totally pristine 1983 Chrysler New Yorker. Uses  no oil between changes. Still gets decent gas mileage. But by Obama’s standards, it’s a clunker. You know what? I’ll keep my clunker with its reliable old 318 cubic inch V8. I like the plush, roomy interior. I like the smooth ride. I like the thoroughly bad-assed Chrysler factory stereo. I like the fact that I scarcely feel the bumps on the county road where I live. And, I like the fact that I am protected by a veritable fortress of good old-fashioned American iron. If you want to drive a sardine can on wheels for the sake of saving three or four bucks at the gas pump,  go ahead. But for your own safety please don’t get off the go-kart track.

See ya’ll on the road

Alan