Saturday, March 31, 2007

Honoring the Fallen

By Alan Burkhart

In a show of love and respect for the fallen and undying support for our troops, a huge convoy of Mississippi state troopers, truckers and bikers gathered to welcome U.S. Marine Cpl. Dustin Jerome Lee home from Iraq. Dustin was killed a few days ago in Fallujah. He was the son of Mississippi state trooper Jerome Lee.

The images were taken Friday (March 30) as truckers gathered along US highway 11 to participate. I was unable to attend since I was already on my way to Denver, Colorado, but my good friends Mike and Patsy Easterling were on hand with their camera. Many thanks to them for passing along some great pics of some fine people.

The convoy of truckers, bikers and troopers escorted Dustin from the air base in Meridian, MS to a funeral home in Quitman. As I understand it, the convoy will also escort him from Quitman to the grave site where he is to be laid to rest today. Mike and Pat were unable to attend today, so the images below are all from Friday.

A fine article about Dustin's passing is posted at the Meridian Star.

Best to all - -
Alan

A long line of truckers and law enforcement awaiting the go-ahead to begin Dustin's escort
This image is by Brian Livingston of the Meridian Star. To the right of the honor guard carrying Dustin's coffin, you can see his father, MS highway patrolman Jerome Lee saluting his son.
Bikers (above) and law enforcement (below) gathered to show their respect for the fallen
Truckers from all over the Southeast were gathered outside Key Field to escort Dustin to his final resting place.
Mike and Patsy's truck - waiting in line on hwy 11 outside the base

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Hatred versus Hope

By Alan Burkhart

The fact that I often write about the dangers posed by radical Islam has over time brought me some interesting correspondence from Muslims who disagreed with my views. Some represent at least rudimentary thought, while others are barely coherent. The common thread to all of the correspondence I've received from radical Muslims is an utterly mindless hostility.

I should hasten to add that I am referring only to elements of radical Islam, not mainstream Muslims. The majority of the Muslims with whom I am acquainted are decent, honest people. They tend to be well-educated and knowledgeable both in history and current events. Mainstream Muslims do, however, have their own issues to deal with, not the least of which is their overall failure to combat the hijacking of their faith by a cadre of murderous ideologues.

Consider the testimony of Professor J. Michael Waller (Institute of World Politics) before the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security in October 2003:

"Curiously, there is no shortage of normal Muslims in this country who agree with the critics. However, they are not organized and often have felt too intimidated to speak out."


In many cases (and this is just one man's opinion), ignorance seems to be the difference between a Muslim teenager who blows himself up in a pizza parlor and the kindly old Iraqi doctor who treated me for an allergic reaction a couple years back. People who have hope - a belief that their future can be better than their present circumstances - will rarely commit acts of senseless violence. The fact that Muslim youth can be deluded into believing that seventy-two virgins await each of them after committing an act of utter savagery makes it obvious that hope is a rare commodity in the Muslim world. It is equally obvious that ignorance is in plentiful supply. A handful of radical Muslim clerics hold the lives of their brethren in their bloodstained hands.

It should come as no surprise that Muslim chaplains are having considerable success recruiting new converts in U.S. prisons. Woefully uneducated and feeling disenfranchised, convicts are easy prey for those who fill their heads with false promises of an eternity of fleshly pleasure. Violent felons and radical Islam are unfortunately a match made in Heaven. Or Hell.

Just how much hatred exists in the mind of a radical Muslim? Consider these messages I've received from Muslims who took issue with past articles on this subject. The only editing I've done is the removal of expletives. They are otherwise displayed exactly as I received them:

March 17, 2007
haha sometimes i read things against Islam and i get mad because people try
to give it a bad name....lol you however have produced such a false image of
Islam that it makes me laugh....anyways here is something that you might
like to know...IN the nine months following sept 11, 35 000 people in the
United States alone converted to Islam and 2/3rd's of them were
women....does that make you mad? doesnt matter your hateful message is
fortunately not the majority of peoples views, so i guess you can keep
wasting your breath. Oh one more thing, ask yourself, if Islam downgrades
women why do so many women convert to it? If your not busy please get back
to me, ill pray for you in the meantime. Farewell

"Sideedali Chaudhry"

December 18, 2005
Hey racist ignorant child molesting white trash

I really love the way you ignorant racist bigots create a stereotype of 1.5 billion Muslims by repeating the acts of 1 Muslim over and over again. I am a Muslim. I am Turkish. I am a women. I grew up in America. I work on Wall Street in America. I visit Turkey every year. I have seen both Muslim culture and American culture. While the Muslim world does a problem with oppression of women, America is no haven for women's rights.

America has a very serious wide spread child molestation problem. There are also large numbers of incest and abuse suffered by the ""white trash of America"". Finally, The biggest dirty little secret that is so widespread it affects almost 100 percent of all working women in America is sexual harassment at work.

As a women, when I go to Turkey, I am treated like a human. In America I was fired because I refused allow a disgusting 60 year old Christian man to molest me. I was told either put up with the attempted molestation or be fired.

As a Muslim women, I am glad that oppression of Muslim women is exposed but as a women working and living in America, I wish the American media would expose the blatant and rampant sexual harassment forced on almost 100 percent of all American working women.

"Angela"

July 29, 2005
Hi a**hole,
My name is Mohammed Jawabreh. I just read some of the thing published on your fu**in website. You are a fu**in idiot, none of the things I have read about Islam and the prophet Mohammed that are on the website are true. Before you publish anything, get your facts straight. You are just a just a fu**in idiot.

"Mohammed Jawabreh"

So, Sideedali evidently believes I'm ignorant of history. Perhaps Sideedali needs to be reminded that his so-called "prophet" led a series of bloody raids across the ancient world, all without provocation. Maybe the USS Cole slipped his mind. Maybe he was sleeping when the WTC was bombed in 1993. Perhaps he's never seen Muslims dancing in the streets when innocent Israelis are murdered. Who needs a history lesson?

Also worth noting is the fact that Sideedali sees a sexual aspect to his faith. He obviously expects me to be jealous over the fact that his religion might be "getting the girls." I'll leave it to the psychologists to figure that one out. History states that Mohammad had numerous wives, the youngest being nine years old when he married her.

As to "Angela" I find it amazing that she can feel human when she visits a Muslim country. Under the fist of hard line fundamentalist Islamic governments, women are sometimes banned from even having an education. They can't own cars. They cannot vote or hold public office. Fathers kill their daughters if they suspect they've been "tainted" by a local boy. Pardon me for thinking women have it marginally better in Western Civilization. Silly me.

One other item regarding Angela - given her mangling of the English language, you might find cause to doubt her assertion that she works on Wall Street. I on the other hand find it quite plausible that she works on Wall Street. As a janitor.

Regarding Mr. Jawabreh, what can I say? He is a shining example of the ignorance and hopelessness I've described. I can't help but wonder if he's even still alive.

In spite of the constant media coverage of missile attacks, road side bombings, abductions and decapitations, many Americans still don't get it. We are facing the most dangerous enemy in our history, and that enemy will not rest until Western Civilization has been eliminated in favor of Islamic law.

They don't hate us because of our foreign policy or our comfortable lifestyle. They hate us because we do not share their beliefs. In the mind of the Muslim extremist, any who reject the teachings of Mohammad must be either enslaved or killed. That's not idle rhetoric. It is an integral part of what they believe.

Having said all the above, I'll close with this: The War on Terror cannot be won solely by shedding our precious blood. We must address the ignorance and the hatred that leads millions of young men and women to destroy themselves in the name of a false god. Western "infidels" cannot accomplish this daunting task. The ultimate solution to Islamic terror must come from within. Until moderate, mainstream Muslims stand up and force change upon their faith and their culture, the carnage will continue.

Related Reading:

Saturday, March 17, 2007

We Don't Know When...

By Alan Burkhart

On March 17, 2007 I was in the Flying J Travel Center near Jackson, MS. I'd just eaten breakfast and was headed back out to the truck. I grew curious when I saw a couple of fire trucks and a police cruiser near my truck, and ambled over to see what the matter was.

Seems that a trucker who was driving toward the exit had suffered a massive heart attack and died almost instantly. He hadn't been moving very fast, but nevertheless his rig drifted into the Volvo tractor pictured here. The trailer caught the front fender of the Volvo and pretty much destroyed the whole right side.

Another driver nearby had been checking his rig over before getting started and had to make a flying leap to avoid being run down literally as the poor guy was dying. He told me he had jumped out of the way, and saw the guy clutching his chest and falling over as the truck rolled by.

No one was hurt, and emergency personnel arrived quickly. By the time I stumbled onto the scene, they were just leaving with the deceased driver's rig. A tow truck arrived shortly afterwards to tow away the Volvo.

Just goes to show ya... we never know when our number is up. Enjoy each day and be grateful for it.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Freedom versus Zealotry

By Alan Burkhart

A free society cannot succeed when ideologues exert a degree of influence on government disproportionate to their numbers. Sharia law is a good example, although most Americans cannot fully understand the hardships it imposes. A fine example of the dangers involved when a minority imposes its beliefs on others via legislation can be found in my adopted home state of Mississippi.

It's no secret that Mississippi has endured its share of hard times both before and since Hurricane Katrina. Governor Haley Barbour and pro-business legislators are working hard to solve these problems using time-proven methods to stimulate our economy and improve the state's education system. But as dictated by the laws of both physics and partisan politics, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Allow me to introduce you to the American Family Association, based in Tupelo, MS. The AFA is a group of religious conservatives who use boycotts and petition drives to affect change both in Mississippi and in Washington, DC. That's all well and good. I'm a strong believer in political and social activism. The problem lies not in the methods themselves, but rather in how and why those methods are used.

The current bone of contention for the AFA is Mississippi House Bill 1142. This is an economic stimulus bill aimed at bringing in more tourism dollars to the state, principally in the Gulf Coast area. The bill would provide generous tax incentives for the creation of amusement parks, race tracks, hotels, museums and other tourism-related businesses. The bill at one time also included casinos, but thanks largely to the actions of the AFA, the following language has been added to the Senate version of the bill:

"The term "tourism project" does not include any business, corporation or entity having a gaming license issued under Section 75-76-1 et seq., but may include an entertainment enterprise owned by such a business, corporation or entity that is in excess of development that the State Gaming Commission requires for the issuance or renewal or a gaming license."


Intense lobbying efforts by the AFA resulted in the above language being added to the State Senate's version of the bill. It has since been sent back to the State House to be voted on again. In essence, a casino owner can build a hotel and get the tax break. But casinos themselves don't qualify. Why? Because gambling is against God's law, that's why.

Okay, we all know that God does not condone gambling. As a practicing Christian, I don't even buy lottery tickets. If however, my neighbors choose to play stud poker on the weekend, I don't use my King James Bible to beat down their door. It's their business, not mine.

If only the AFA would take a similar attitude. Gambling is an immoral activity, but not an illegal one in Mississippi. No one is dragging Mississippians into the casinos and holding guns to their heads while they play video poker. And let's not forget that casinos add thousands of good jobs and billions of dollars to the state economy. The casinos deserve the same incentives offered to other businesses in the tourism bill, but they are unlikely to get those benefits. Here is a quote from the AFA website on the subject:

"The gambling industry and the Mississippi Economic Council are putting extreme pressure on the representatives to give the rebates to the casinos. The gambling industry has established itself as a powerful force in Mississippi. They will not be happy until they control our government...
"...If they (MS legislators) now vote to give them a tax rebate worth millions, it will be clear that they are pro-gambling."


Let's take a realistic look at this. First, I have serious doubts that the gambling industry is attempting to control the state government. They will certainly lobby the government for legislation that benefits them, but that's a far cry from "control." This is pure paranoia and propaganda from an organization that would create a theocracy on American soil if it could.

As to legislators being "pro-gambling," I'd say that those state legislators are instead pro-business and are not hamstrung by theological bias. One of the most important jobs of government is to promote economic growth. Government is at its best in this regard when it simply steps out of the way and allows the economy to grow on its own. By lessening the tax burden on new businesses and the expansion of existing businesses, the Mississippi legislature would be doing exactly that.

It's a safe bet (yeah, I know it's a bad pun) that the AFA is looking not only at the moral aspect of this bill, but also the effect that gambling can have on some people. Those who become psychologically addicted to gambling often wreck their lives and the lives of those who care about them. That's unfortunate, but it's not the fault of the casinos.

Gambling is a voluntary activity. If the weak-minded develop an addiction to gambling, there is help available. To blame the gaming industry for the poor judgment of others is no different from those who seek to ban firearms. No gun in recorded history has ever killed anyone. It's the person wielding the weapon who does the killing. The same goes for gambling. If I flush my entire paycheck down the toilet at a casino, whose fault is it? No one forced me to visit the craps table.

And this is where the line is drawn. Christians have both the right and the obligation to share our beliefs all across America and the world. In the United States, our right to practice and share our beliefs is clearly defined in the First Amendment to the Constitution. But we don't have the right to have our beliefs codified into law. In case you slept through high school history class, one of the most important reasons for the American Revolutionary War was to be free from the iron-fisted rule of the Church of England.

The AFA and other faith-based groups would do humanity a much greater service by concentrating upon swaying the hearts and minds of nonbelievers instead of dabbling in public policy. Mixing religion with politics nearly always results either in the imposition of doctrinal tenets upon nonbelievers or yet another limit upon religious expression. Both are outside the bounds of the Constitution.

Gambling presents no hazards for me because my religious faith keeps me away from the video poker machines and the card tables when I visit a casino. Yes, I visit the casinos. Where else can I see ZZ Top and Steppenwolf in the same weekend? I love the shows and the great food and the tangy salt air on the Gulf Coast.

Religious faith and government both play important roles in American life, but each governs a different aspect of the human condition. Government’s job is to ensure a safe and free society. Religious faith deals with matters spiritual and emotional. When one collides with the other, the result is almost always a net loss of freedom for Americans.

I hope the Mississippi government will do the right thing and remove the casino exclusion from Bill 1142. Our nation is a better, safer place when government and religion stay out of each other's way.

Related Reading:

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Tornadoes, Politics and Child Safety

By Alan Burkhart

Recent tragic events in Missouri, Georgia and Alabama should send a strong message to anyone who has been paying attention to all the fuss about climate change: The time for politicizing the weather is over. Every scientist who contributed to the IPCC's 2007 report knows that the "human connection" to global warming is doubtful at best. Man's tiny contribution to greenhouse gasses has not and will not have any real effect on the cycle of global climate.

The deaths of 20 people, including eight high school students in Enterprise, Alabama is a clear indication of how we should be preparing for climate change. Is the planet warming? Of course it is. But many, perhaps most, climate experts agree that the Earth has been both much colder and much hotter than it is now, and the warming trend will continue regardless of actions we take to reduce atmospheric CO2. On average, Man only produces about 3.2 percent of the Earth's total of 186 billion tons of yearly CO2 emissions. To assert that Man is behind the global warming "crisis" is patently absurd, yet that is exactly what the Left is doing.

If anyone in the Democrat Party or the various leftist environmental groups possesses a shred of character, they'll drop their politics and turn their considerable resources toward preparing for the coming years of violent weather. To do otherwise is to declare their questionable political agenda as being more important than the lives of innocent American children.

The media would also do well to cease its politicking and address real concerns. Consider a March Third Associated Press article by Deb Riechmann. The article detailed President Bush's visit to the tornado-ravaged areas of the Southeast, and Riechmann simply could not resist a blatant attempt at calling Mr. Bush’s motives into question:

"Bush made the hastily arranged trip to highlight his administration's stepped-up efforts, especially by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to provide immediate help to disaster victims. The White House came under withering criticism for its response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005."


Now excuse me Deb, but since when is it unusual for a sitting president to visit a disaster area? I cannot recall a time when this was not a normal and expected practice. Several American towns have been devastated. Twenty people were killed in less than 24 hours by 31 tornadoes, and Deb Riechmann wants to play politics.

Rather than playing political games with the climate (which is exactly what the Left is trying to do), shouldn't we address the real problem? That problem is simple enough to understand: The planet will continue to warm until we reach the end of the current interglacial period. That's going to happen regardless of whether you drive a 10-ton SUV or a dinky Japanese hybrid. Historically, interglacial warming periods last 15,000 to 20,000 years. The current interglacial has been around for approximately 18,000 years. It is safe to assume we have many years of naturally occurring and completely unstoppable global warming ahead of us. Instead of wrecking Western Culture in a bogus attempt to change what cannot be changed, shouldn't we be preparing for the future?

Consider the words of Professor Jane Francis, a respected British scientist at the University of Leeds:
"What we are seeing really is just another interglacial phase within our big icehouse climate,'' Francis told Reuters.
Dismissing political calls for a global effort to reverse climate change, she said, "It's really farcical because the climate has been changing constantly. What we should do is be more aware of the fact that it is changing and that we should be ready to adapt to the change."


Earth's climate is affected by inconsistencies in her orbit and rotation, cosmic rays from exploding stars in deep space, naturally occurring CO2 emissions, tectonic activity and a host of other forces beyond our ability to control. If the Left (and the Right for that matter) wishes to accomplish something worthwhile, they should get off their electoral soapboxes and work toward preparing for the coming storms.

I live in Southeastern Mississippi. I remember the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. I saw first hand the wrecked homes and shattered lives. I’ve seen the results of powerful tornadoes and straight-line winds and massive floods. Less than a week ago, I found myself fleeing my humble mobile home and venturing into the local Wal-Mart until a line of powerful super cells passed through. Outside, the shopping carts in the parking lot engaged in an impromptu demolition derby while the driving rain reduced visibility to nearly zero. The weather in the Southeast is quite exciting with or without a category 5 hurricane (my home survived yet again - prayer works!).

States prone to violent weather should receive additional funding to build storm shelters in schools capable of withstanding a direct hit by an F-5 tornado. Imagine if Enterprise High School had had such a shelter. In all likelihood, those eight kids would be alive today. I'm not questioning the actions of the faculty at Enterprise. I'm sure they did their level best to protect the children and I respect them for it. However, given the nature of the weather in the Southeast and Midwest, especially over the last 15 or 20 years, shouldn't we be doing more?

Schools, and perhaps other state-funded facilities, should be required to have such shelters, and adequate federal funding assistance for such shelters should be required as well. Private citizens should receive generous tax credits specifically for building such shelters for their homes and businesses in storm-prone areas of the country. How much better would it be to spend federal money in such a manner instead of ridiculous ideas like Dick Durbin’s notion of taxpayer-funded political campaigns (so your money might go to the guy you’re voting against).

Designing buildings, especially schools, to be safe from deadly storms is no less important and no less practical than designing buildings and bridges that resist earthquakes. We have the technology and resources to make ourselves safer and the events of March 1 make it obvious that the need exists. Politicians, especially Hillary Clinton, love to use the phrase "for the children" when they're getting ready to dump a boatload of taxpayer money into another questionable project. Here's a chance for them to do something that actually makes a difference.

Related Reading: